4.4 Article

Semen analysis and treatment risk factors in long-term survivors of childhood cancer

期刊

ANDROLOGIA
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/and.13853

关键词

cancer treatment; childhood cancer survivors; gonadotrophin levels; semen analysis

资金

  1. Ministerstvo Zdravotnictvi Ceske Republiky [AZV NV19-03-00245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed a higher rate of abnormal semen analysis among long-term childhood cancer survivors, especially those treated with alkylating agents. Abnormal semen analysis was associated with elevated gonadotrophin levels.
The objective of this study was to compare semen quality (sperm density, progressive motility and spermia) between long-term childhood cancer survivors and a control group of males. The second objective was to correlate the semen analysis of the survivors with cancer treatment and endocrine status. The semen quality of 143 survivors (median age, 23.6 years) was compared to 200 men (median age, 27.9 years) who had not been diagnosed with cancer. The cancer-related risk factors and gonadotrophin levels were compared. Overall, 65% of the survivors had abnormal semen analysis compared to 26.5% of the controls (p < 0.0001). Survivors with nonaspermia had lower sperm density than the controls (p < 0.001). Other observed correlations were not significant. Survivors who were treated with alkylating agents were more likely to have abnormal semen analysis (p < 0.008). Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone levels were significantly elevated (p < 0.0001) in survivors with abnormal semen analysis. The semen quality parameters, except for low sperm density, did not differ in survivors with nonaspermia compared to the controls. The risk factors included treatment with alkylating agents. Elevated gonadotrophin levels correlated with abnormal semen analysis. All cancer survivors should be made aware of the possibility of suffering from cancer treatment-related infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据