4.8 Article

Intracellular Metal-Organic Frameworks: Integrating an All-In-One Semiconductor Electrode Chip for Therapy, Capture, and Quantification of Circulating Tumor Cells

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 19, 页码 13319-13326

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02618

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775016, 21874013]
  2. Research Funds for the Central Universities [N170502003, N170908001, N2005027]
  3. Talent Project of Revitalizing Liaoning [XLYC1807165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capture, analysis, and inactivation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have emerged as important issues for the early diagnosis and therapy of cancer. In this study, an all-in-one sensing device was developed by integrating magnetic metal-organic framework (magMOF) nano-particles (NPs) and TiO2 nanotube arrays (TiNTs). The magMOF NPs are composed of a magnetic Fe3O4 core and a MIL-100(Fe) shell, which is loaded with glucose oxidase (GOD) and provides an intensive starvation therapy by catalyzing the consumption of cellular nutrients, thus accelerating the generation of intracellular iron ions by MIL-100(Fe) dissolution. Importantly, these iron ions not only lead to an intensive Fenton-like reaction but also establish an excellent correlation of electrochemical intensities with cancer cell numbers. Owing to the intracellular magMOF NPs, the CTCs were magnetically collected onto TiNTs. The exogenous center dot OH radicals generated by TiNT photocatalysis trigger iron ions to be rapidly released out and subsequently detected via differential pulse voltammetry using TiNTs as the electrode. An excellent correlation of differential pulse voltammetry intensities with CTC numbers is obtained from 2 to 5000 cell mL(-1). This nanoplatform not only paves a way to combine starvation therapy agents with Fenton-like reaction for chemodynamic therapy but also opens up new insights into the construction of all-in-one chips for CTC capture and diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据