4.8 Article

Dissecting the Effect of Salt for More Sensitive Label-Free Colorimetric Detection of DNA Using Gold Nanoparticles

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 19, 页码 13354-13360

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02688

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876208]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201706370185]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Taking advantage of the protection effect of single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) remain dispersed and retain a red color with the addition of a low concentration of salt, while AuNPs would aggregate in the presence of double-stranded DNA. This difference has been used to design label-free colorimetric sensors for DNA detection. NaCl is the most commonly used salt to induce the aggregation of AuNPs. In this work, we aimed to test if other salts can provide even better sensor performance and to understand the effects of the cations and anions in salts. We first studied the effect of anions, including halides (NaF, NaCl, NaBr, and NaI), and other common salts (NaNO3, NaClO4, Na2SO4, Na2S2O3, sodium phosphate, and sodium citrate). Among them, weakly adsorbing ones such as F-, citrate, and phosphate appeared to yield better sensitivity than Cl-. Anions can directly adsorb on the AuNPs and affect DNA adsorption. We then tested cations, and only group 1A metals (LiCl, NaCl, KCl, RbCl, and CsCl) can signal DNA adsorption, while divalent metals (MgCl2, CaC(l)2, MnCl2, and NiCl2) barely showed the effect of DNA. CsCl only works for strongly adsorbing DNA, such as A(15), but not weakly adsorbing T-15. Overall, NaF is a better salt than NaCl by having a 2.3-fold higher sensitivity, which was confirmed in a DNA sensing assay. This work has identified a better salt yielding higher sensitivity, and sensing work relying on the change of the aggregation state of AuNPs can benefit from this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据