4.7 Article

SERS and fluorescence detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with specific capture-release mode based on multifunctional gold nanomaterials and dual-selective recognition

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1141, 期 -, 页码 206-213

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.10.033

关键词

CTCs detection; Gold nanostars; SERS imaging; Fluorescence imaging; Hybrid chain reaction

资金

  1. Project Fund for Shandong Key RD Program [2017GGX20121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dual-selective recognition and multi-enhanced SERS-fluorescence detection platform was designed for circulating tumor cells (CTCs), utilizing aptamers and anti-EpCAM for improved selectivity; the released CTCs were detected using SERS and fluorescence with good linear relationships.
Herein, a dual-selective recognition and multi-enhanced surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)fluorescence dual mode detection platform is designed for the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). The gold nanoflowers (AuNFs) substrate was synthesized and the CTCs were captured on the surface area of AuNFs/ITO substrate by aptamers modified. At the same time, the novel nanoprobe was designed, anti-EpCAM (AE) and trigger DNA were modified onto the surface of gold nanostars (AuNSs) through a PEG linker. The novel nanoprobe identified CTCs through the specific recognition reaction between AE and the cell epithelial adhesion molecule of the CTCs. The dual-recognition cellular mechanism of the aptamers and AE improves selectivity. Then, the complementary sequence (CS) hybridize with aptamers to release the captured CTCs into the culture medium. The number of CTCs released was detected by SERS and fluorescence. The limit of SERS detection was 5 cells/mL with a linear relationship from 5 to 200 cells/mL. The limit of fluorescence detection was 10 cells/mL with a linear relationship from 10 to 200 cells/mL. Thus, the developed CTCs detection platform demonstrates promising applications for clinical diagnosis. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据