Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for cholecystitis at high risk of operative difficulties: A propensity score-matching analysis

Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated the superiority of early (EC) over delayed (DC) cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, none have assessed the effect of operative difficulty when reporting on treatment outcomes. Methods: Outcomes of patients who underwent EC or DC between 2010 and 2019 were compared taking into account the operative difficulty evaluated by the Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy score (DiLC). For each patient, the DiLC score was retrospectively calculated and corresponded to the foreseeable operative difficulty measured on admission for AC. A propensity score was used to account for confounders. Primary endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) and the occurrence of a serious operative/post-operative event (SOE). Results: DC in patients with DiLC >= 10 reduced the risk of SOE without increasing the LOS. Conversely, DC in patients with DiLC<10 increased the LOS without improving outcomes. Multivariate analysis found EC in patients with DiLC >= 10 as the main independent predictor of SOE. Conclusions: Provided prospective validation, DC for AC in patients with DiLC >= 10 seems safer than EC and is not hospital-stay consuming. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

The study compared the effects of early and delayed cholecystectomy on the treatment outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis, and found that in patients with higher operative difficulty, delayed cholecystectomy can reduce the risk of serious operative/post-operative events; whereas in patients with lower operative difficulty, delayed cholecystectomy may increase the length of stay.