4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

A clinical coagulopathy score concurrent with viscoelastic testing defines opportunities to improve hemostatic resuscitation and enhance blood product utilization during liver transplantation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 220, 期 6, 页码 1379-1386

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.034

关键词

Liver transplantation; Hemostatic resuscitation; Thrombelastography; Clinical coagulopathy; Coagulopathy score

类别

资金

  1. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [K99HL151887]
  2. American Society of Transplant Surgeons Veloxis Fellowship Award
  3. University of Colorado Academic Enrichment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: An NIH clinical coagulopathy score has been devised for trauma patients, but no such clinical score exists in transplantation surgery. We hypothesize that that this coagulopathy score can effectively identify laboratory defined coagulopathy during liver transplantation and correlates to blood product utilization. Methods: TEGs were performed and coagulopathy scores (1, normal bleeding 5, diffuse coagulopathic bleeding) were assigned by the surgeons at 5 intra-operative time points. Blood products used during the case were recorded between time points. Statistical analyses were performed to identify correlations between coagulopathy scores, TEG-detected abnormalities, and blood product utilization. Result: Transfusions rarely correlated with the appropriate TEG measurements of coagulation dysfunction. Coagulopathy score had significant correlation to various transfusions and TEG-detected coagulopathies at multiple points during the case. High aggregate coagulopathy scores identified patients receiving more transfusions, re-operations, and longer hospital stays Conclusion: The combination of viscoelastic testing and a standardized clinical coagulopathy score has the potential to optimize transfusions if used in tandem as well as standardize communication between surgery and anesthesia teams about clinically evident coagulopathy. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据