4.7 Article

Multiple closed loop recycling of carbon fibre composites with the HiPerDiF (High Performance Discontinuous Fibre) method

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 271-277

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.018

关键词

Closed loop recycling; Aligned short-fibre composites; Carbon fibres

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Programme Grant on High Performance Ductile Composite Technology [EP/I02946X/1]
  2. Imperial College, London
  3. EPSRC [EP/K035746/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/I02946X/1, EP/K035746/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K035746/1, EP/I02946X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this article is to apply the concept of Circular Economy, where end-of-life products and production wastes are recycled into reusable materials, to carbon fibre reinforced plastics. This not only reduces the amount of material disposed into landfills, but also enables manufacturers to achieve significant savings. While current research focuses on the performance of recycled carbon fibre reinforced composites after one recycling process, this paper aims to investigate the performance of composites remanufactured from short carbon fibres that have undergone multiple recycling loops with the High Performance Discontinuous Fibre (HiPerDiF) method. The HiPerDiF method enables the production of aligned short fibre composites with exceptional mechanical properties. In addition, using short fibres makes the composite material intrinsically easy to recycle. Short virgin carbon fibres underwent two loops of fibre reclamation and remanufacturing. A correlation between the composites' mechanical properties and the nature of the fibres, i.e. reduction in fibre lengths, as well as the residual matrix accumulation from the reclaiming process over a number of recycling loops, was established. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据