Structural behaviour of hybrid FRP pultruded columns. Part 1: Experimental study

The design of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) pultruded members is often governed by deformability and buckling phenomena, preventing the full exploitation of the material potential. Hybridization the partial replacement of the glass reinforcement with (stiffer) carbon fibres is a possible approach to improve the performance of GFRP thin-walled profiles. This paper presents an experimental study on the structural behaviour of I-section hybrid fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) pultruded columns made of glass and carbon fibres (GF and CF) embedded in a polyester resin. A bare GFRP reference profile and four series of hybrid C-GFRP profiles, with different types and architectures of CF reinforcement, were designed, manufactured and tested under compression in three different lengths short, intermediate and long. Particular attention was given to the budding behaviour of the columns and to the delamination at the interface between GFRP and CFRP layers. In terms of serviceability performance, results obtained confirm the hybridization's effectiveness in increasing the axial stiffness of GFRP compressive members. In terms of ultimate limit states behaviour, hybridization increased the load carrying capacity of the long columns, which exhibited global buckling. In opposition, for the short and intermediate columns, which failed respectively due to local buckling and a combination of global and local buckling, the load carrying capacity of the hybrid columns was lower than that of the reference profile; such worse performance seems to have been caused by the delamination of the CF layers, owing to the relatively high axial strains that developed in those columns. In a companion paper (Part 2), the experimental data presented and discussed herein is compared with predictions from numerical models and analytical formulae, which also provide further information about the delamination and progressive failure of the hybrid columns. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.