4.7 Article

Designing foam filled sandwich panels for blast mitigation using a hybrid evolutionary optimization algorithm

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 72-82

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.081

关键词

Sandwich panel; Hybrid evolutionary algorithm; Blast loading; Corrugated steel core; Polymer foam infill; Shock tube

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
  2. 2219 International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Programme
  3. Bursa Orhangazi University Scientific Research Project [BOU-BAP-004-20142015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing sandwich structures with high energy absorption capability is important for shock loading applications. In the present study, a hybrid evolutionary optimization technique based on Multi-Island Genetic Algorithm and Hooke-Jeeves Algorithm is used in the design stage of the sandwich structures to obtain effective results. Optimum parameters of cell geometry were investigated using the hybrid optimization algorithm to design foam filled sandwich panels for three main boundary conditions. Shock tube experiments were conducted in order to simulate the shock load effects along with 3D and 2D finite element analysis. Using the experimental results, a simulation-based design optimization approach was prepared and used to develop the designs of new sandwich structures. Promising results were obtained for all three different boundary conditions. In the simply supported case, 21% improvement of shock absorption was achieved by using 57% less volume of foam with respect to the original fully foam filled sandwich panel. In the clamped-clamped case, 16% improvement of shock absorption with 52% less volume was obtained. In the rigid base case study, 6% improvement of shock absorption with 38% less volume usage was achieved. The structures developed in this study will be of use in the defense, automotive and other industries. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据