4.7 Article

A SFEM-based evaluation of mode-I Stress Intensity Factor in composite structures

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 162-185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.076

关键词

Composite materials; Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics; Generalized Differential Quadrature; Stress Intensity Factor; Strong Formulation Finite Element Method

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [279439]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [279439]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [279439] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Strong Formulation Finite Element Method (SFEM) based on the Generalized Differential Quadrature (GDQ) method is applied in the present work to estimate numerically the Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) for a single edge-notched tensile specimen (SENT) with different length-to-width ratios and composite materials, as well as for a Center Cracked Tension (CCT) and a Double Edge-Notched Tensile (DENT) specimens, under a mode-I loading condition. The basis notions of the fracture mechanics are herein analyzed numerically in order to evaluate the influence of possible cracks within materials and to relate the dimensions of cracks and the applied loading to the varying stress distribution. The numerical results, in terms of stresses and SIFs, are straightforwardly compared to those ones given by the standard Finite Element Method (FEM) and theoretical predictions available from the literature. This work presents a consistent approach for the computation of the SIF using a strong form methodology. The main aim is to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed methodology when treating classical plane stress problems with cracks. We show and discuss results from several numerical examples, including different composite materials and varying geometries for a mode-I SENT, CCT and DENT specimens. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据