期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 190, 期 6, 页码 1088-1100出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa235
关键词
causal inference; effect-measure modification; heterogeneity of treatment effects; observational studies; subgroup analysis
资金
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) [ME-1306-03758, ME-1502-27794]
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Research Service Award [T32AGHS00001]
This study describes methods for assessing heterogeneity of treatment effects in observational studies, comparing the performance of different estimators in finite samples. The methods were applied to data from a specific study to compare the effect of surgery plus medical therapy with medical therapy alone in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.
Here we describe methods for assessing heterogeneity of treatment effects over prespecified subgroups in observational studies, using outcome-model-based (g-formula), inverse probability weighting, doubly robust, and matching estimators of subgroup-specific potential outcome means, conditional average treatment effects, and measures of heterogeneity of treatment effects. We compare the finite-sample performance of different estimators in simulation studies where we vary the total sample size, the relative frequency of each subgroup, the magnitude of treatment effect in each subgroup, and the distribution of baseline covariates, for both continuous and binary outcomes. We find that the estimators' bias and variance vary substantially in finite samples, even when there is no unobserved confounding and no model misspecification. As an illustration, we apply the methods to data from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (August 1975-December 1996) to compare the effect of surgery plus medical therapy with that of medical therapy alone for chronic coronary artery disease in subgroups defined by previous myocardial infarction or left ventricular ejection fraction.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据