4.7 Review

Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): A report from the 2018 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workshop

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1714-1733

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12157

关键词

Alzheimer's disease-related dementias; cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease; vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  4. NIH [R01AG048642, RF1054548, RF10621022, P30AG062429, P30AG059299, R01HL111062, R01HL131515]
  5. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  6. Foundation Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence [16 CVD 05]
  7. Mayo Foundation
  8. Alzheimer's Association [VCID-17-509279]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) are characterized by the aging neurovascular unit being confronted with and failing to cope with biological insults due to systemic and cerebral vascular disease, proteinopathy including Alzheimer's biology, metabolic disease, or immune response, resulting in cognitive decline. This report summarizes the discussion and recommendations from a working group convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to evaluate the state of the field in VCID research, identify research priorities, and foster collaborations. As discussed in this report, advances in understanding the biological mechanisms of VCID across the wide spectrum of pathologies, chronic systemic comorbidities, and other risk factors may lead to potential prevention and new treatment strategies to decrease the burden of dementia. Better understanding of the social determinants of health that affect risks for both vascular disease and VCID could provide insight into strategies to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in VCID.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据