4.7 Article

A new multi-p-norm formulation approach for stress-based topology optimization design

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 10-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.058

关键词

Topology optimization; Stress limit; Composite structures; Multi-p-norm; SIMP; Load independent

资金

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2012/14576-9, 2015/06334-3]
  2. CNPq (National Council for Research and Development) [471954/2013-6, 304121/2013-4]
  3. CAPES (Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) [A023_2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the stress-based topology optimization problem has been extensively studied for continuum structures, it is still an open problem and there is still room for improvements. This work proposes a comprehensive approach for dealing with stresses in topology optimization problems. The SIMP method is used to distribute material along the domain. For limiting the stress, a multi-p-norm formulation is proposed to deal with the local nature of stress and to avoid stress concentration. This function considers many values of p coefficients at the same time while other formulations adopt a specific value for p defined for subregions. As a consequence this formulation can avoid the stress concentrations without being necessary to define sub-regions. In addition, the proposed formulation is load independent because the multi-p-norm is used as the objective function. A SIMP-like formulation is used to address the stress singularity phenomenon and the heaviside projection is used to avoid mesh dependency, checkerboarding, and to control the minimum length-scale. A proper continuation scheme is proposed to all penalization coefficients in order to achieve black-and-white solutions. The optimization problem is solved by using GCMMA. Numerical examples for homogeneous and composite structures are presented to illustrate the proposed formulation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据