4.7 Article

Aging-associated changes in CD47 arrangement and interaction with thrombospondin-1 on red blood cells visualized by super-resolution imaging

期刊

AGING CELL
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.13224

关键词

aging; CD47; dSTORM; red blood cells; thrombospondin-1

资金

  1. MOST of the People's Republic of China [2015CB964400, 2017YFA0505300]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [IRT1133, IRT_15R24]
  3. NSFC [81273334, 81401372, 81501432, 21727816, 21525314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD47 serves as a ligand for signaling regulatory protein alpha (SIRP alpha) and as a receptor for thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1). Although CD47, TSP-1, and SIRP alpha are thought to be involved in the clearance of aged red blood cells (RBCs), aging-associated changes in the expression and interaction of these molecules on RBCs have been elusive. Using direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM)-based imaging and quantitative analysis, we can report that CD47 molecules on young RBCs reside as nanoclusters with little binding to TSP-1, suggesting a minimal role for TSP-1/CD47 signaling in normal RBCs. On aged RBCs, CD47 molecules decreased in number but formed bigger and denser clusters, with increased ability to bind TSP-1. Exposure of aged RBCs to TSP-1 resulted in a further increase in the size of CD47 clusters via a lipid raft-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, CD47 cluster formation was dramatically inhibited onthbs1(-/-)mouse RBCs and associated with a significantly prolonged RBC lifespan. These results indicate that the strength of CD47 binding to its ligand TSP-1 is predominantly determined by the distribution pattern and not the amount of CD47 molecules on RBCs, and offer direct evidence for the role of TSP-1 in phagocytosis of aged RBCs. This study provides clear nanoscale pictures of aging-associated changes in CD47 distribution and TSP-1/CD47 interaction on the cell surface, and insights into the molecular basis for how these molecules coordinate to remove aged RBCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据