4.6 Article

Ionospheric response to the 17 March and 22 June 2015 geomagnetic storms over Wuhan region using GNSS-based tomographic technique

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 111-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.008

关键词

Ionospheric electron density distributions; Multiplication algebraic reconstruction technique; Ionospheric storm effects

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41574146, 41774162]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1503506]
  3. CAS [E016YR1R]
  4. Shaanxi Provincial Talents Plan [E039SB1K]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of ionospheric storm effects over Wuhan region during the period from March 17 to June 22, 2015, using GNSS data and CIT technique, reveals significant decreases in electron density during the storm periods, with lasting negative effects observed during the recovery phase.
By using the data of GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) observation from Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC), ionospheric electron density (IED) distributions reconstructed by using computerized ionospheric tomography (CIT) technique are used to investigate the ionospheric storm effects over Wuhan region during 17 March and 22 June 2015 geomagnetic storm periods. F-region critical frequency (foF2) at Wuhan ionosonde station shows an obvious decrease during recovery phase of the St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm. Moreover, tomographic results present that the decrease in electron density begins at 12:00 UT on 17 March during the storm main phase. Also, foF2 shows a long-lasting negative storm effect during the recovery phase of the 22 June 2015 geomagnetic storm. Electron density chromatography presents the evident decrease during the storm day in accordance with the ionosonde observation. These ionospheric negative storm effects are probably associated with changes of chemical composition, PPEF and DDEF from high latitudes. (C) 2020 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据