4.8 Article

A Metal-Organic Framework as a Multifunctional Ionic Sieve Membrane for Long-Life Aqueous Zinc-Iodide Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202004240

关键词

aqueous zinc-iodide batteries; electrolyte solvation regulation; metal-organic frameworks; triiodide; iodide redox couple; zinc electrodeposits

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0100203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation (NSF) of China [21673166, 21633003, u1801252]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The introduction of the redox couple of triiodide/iodide (I-3(-)/I-) into aqueous rechargeable zinc batteries is a promising energy-storage resource owing to its safety and cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, the limited lifespan of zinc-iodine (Zn-I-2) batteries is currently far from satisfactory owing to the uncontrolled shuttling of triiodide and unfavorable side-reactions on the Zn anode. Herein, space-resolution Raman and micro-IR spectroscopies reveal that the Zn anode suffers from corrosion induced by both water and iodine species. Then, a metal-organic framework (MOF) is exploited as an ionic sieve membrane to simultaneously resolve these problems for Zn-I(2)batteries. The multifunctional MOF membrane, first, suppresses the shuttling of I(3)(-)and restrains related parasitic side-reaction on the Zn anode. Furthermore, by regulating the electrolyte solvation structure, the MOF channels construct a unique electrolyte structure (more aggregative ion associations than in saturated electrolyte). With the concurrent improvement on both the iodine cathode and the Zn anode, Zn-I(2)batteries achieve an ultralong lifespan (>6000 cycles), high capacity retention (84.6%), and high reversibility (Coulombic efficiency: 99.65%). This work not only systematically reveals the parasitic influence of free water and iodine species to the Zn anode, but also provides an efficient strategy to develop long-life aqueous Zn-I(2)batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据