4.8 Article

Bioinspired Engineering of a Bacterium-Like Metal-Organic Framework for Cancer Immunotherapy

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 42, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202003764

关键词

bacteria-mediated tumor therapy; checkpoint blockade; combination therapy; in situ vaccination; metal-organic framework

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology
  2. MOST [107-2314-B-007-002-MY3, 108-2119-M-007-005, 108-3017-F-007-003]
  3. Ministry of Education [MOE 108QR001I5]
  4. Taiwan (ROC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria-mediated tumor therapy (BMTT) has been known for decades; however, its clinical use is inhibited by its association with infections. To address this issue, a spiky, bacterium-like metal-organic framework (MOF), which can replicate the functional responses of BMTT without its adverse side-effects, is proposed. MOFs are synthesized in a solvothermal reaction of aluminum sulfate, ruthenium chloride hydrate, and 2-aminoterephthalic acid; they have a spherical morphology or many nanospikes on their surfaces, depending on the reaction temperature. Both spherical and spiky MOFs can function as photothermal agents, converting absorbed optical energy into local heat. Owing to their higher surface area of interaction, spiky MOFs are more easily phagocytosed by macrophages than are spherical MOFs, strengthening their immune responses. Moreover, when injected intratumorally, spiky MOFs reside significantly longer than spherical ones, enabling their use in repeated photothermal treatments. The combination of in situ vaccination with intratumorally injected bacterium-like MOFs under exposure to an near-infrared laser and the immune checkpoint blockade of systemically administered alpha PD-1 is evaluated in tumor-bearing mice. The results indicate that the checkpoint blockade acts synergistically with in situ vaccination to provide diverse antitumor functions of BMTT, destroying a primary tumor and suppressing tumor recurrence and metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据