4.8 Article

Fast Charging All Solid-State Lithium Batteries Enabled by Rational Design of Dual Vertically-Aligned Electrodes

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 50, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202005357

关键词

dual vertically-aligned electrodes; fast charging batteries; lithium batteries; lithium dendrite suppression

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chair Program (CRC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Western University
  5. Chinese Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The slow charging limitations of all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) have significantly limited their practical application. Thus, significant improvement of the rate performance and development of fast charging ASSLBs is crucial for the commercialization of these systems. However, poor Li(+)transport kinetics and Li dendrite formation under high charging current densities have inhibited their capabilities. To tackle these issues, the design of dual vertically-aligned electrodes (DVAEs) is proposed to accelerate Li(+)transport and suppress Li dendrite formation. At the anode side, the vertically-aligned Li (VA-Li) anode with lithiophilic micro-walls enables lateral growth of Li deposits rather than perpendicular to the electrode surface, thus preventing dendrite penetration through the separator. In addition, the 3D vertically-aligned structure in both VA-Li and vertically-aligned-LiFePO4(VA-LFP) enables enhanced Li(+)transport due to lower tortuosity and faster Li(+)transport kinetics. Benefitting from the rational design, VA-Li symmetric cells can operate for 300 h at a current density/capacity of 3 mA cm(-2)/3 mAh cm(-2), while short-circuiting is observed after 87 h for bare Li cycled at only 0.5 mA cm(-2)(capacity: 0.5 mAh cm(-2)). Moreover, a fast-charging ASSLBs assembled with DVAEs demonstrates a high capacity of 89.4 mAh g(-1)after 2000 cycles at 4C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据