4.8 Article

Self-Assemblies of Fe3O4Nanocrystals: Toward Nanoscale Precision of Photothermal Effects in the Tumor Microenvironment

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202006824

关键词

hyperthermia; nanocrystals self-assemblies; photothermal therapy; tumor microenvironment

资金

  1. Institut thematique multi-organismes (ITMO) Cancer
  2. doctoral school Frontieres du Vivant (FdV)-Programme Bettencourt
  3. Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer
  4. European Union [801305, 685795]
  5. IPGP multidisciplinary program PARI
  6. Paris-IdF region SESAME grant [12015908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe(3)O(4) nanocrystals self-assemble into colloidosomes and supraballs, which exhibit different interactions within the tumor microenvironment compared to their individual building blocks. These hybrid self-assemblies target distinct compartments in the tumor microenvironment, leading to local photothermal damages that are not observed with isolated nanocrystals.
Fe(3)O(4)nanocrystals are self-assembled into two different conformations: colloidosome and supraball that confer them with distinct properties determining their photo-induced heating capacities. These self-assemblies are assessed for photothermal therapy, an adjuvant strategy for tumor therapy. The tumor microenvironment is a heterogeneous ecosystem including immune cells and the extracellular matrix. The interactions between photothermal therapy agents and the different components of the tumor microenvironment determine the outcome of this therapy. In this study, the fate of both colloidosomes and supraballs within the tumor microenvironment in comparison to their Fe(3)O(4)nanocrystal building blocks is revealed. This study highlights how these two hybrid self-assemblies target different compartments of the tumor microenvironment and trigger local photothermal damages that are inaccessible for isolated nanocrystals and not predicted by global temperature measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据