4.8 Article

Additive Manufacturing of Material Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: Toward Application in the Clinics

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202006967

关键词

3D printing; additive manufacturing; bone regeneration; scaffolds; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Association Gueules Cassees [21-2016, 10-2018]
  2. European commission under the PF7 program (European Research Council) [GA259370, 790435]
  3. ANR [ANR-18-CE17-0016]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [790435] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE17-0016] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the state-of-the-art materials and AM techniques used in the fabrication of 3D-printed bone scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. The advantages and drawbacks of these materials and techniques are highlighted, with specific criteria for material selection identified. Different combinations of materials and AM techniques are found to be most relevant for specific clinical applications.
Additive manufacturing (AM) allows the fabrication of customized bone scaffolds in terms of shape, pore size, material type, and mechanical properties. Combined with the possibility to obtain a precise 3D image of the bone defects using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, it is now possible to manufacture implants for patient-specific bone regeneration. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of the different materials and AM techniques used for the fabrication of 3D-printed scaffolds in the field of bone tissue engineering. Their advantages and drawbacks are highlighted. For materials, specific criteria, are extracted from a literature study: biomimetism to native bone, mechanical properties, biodegradability, ability to be imaged (implantation and follow-up period), histological performances, and sterilization process. AM techniques can be classified in three major categories: extrusion-based, powder-based, and vat photopolymerization. Their price, ease of use, and space requirement are analyzed. Different combinations of materials/AM techniques appear to be the most relevant depending on the targeted clinical applications (implantation site, presence of mechanical constraints, temporary or permanent implant). Finally, some barriers impeding the translation to human clinics are identified, notably the sterilization process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据