4.8 Article

Self-Assembled Perovskite Nanowire Clusters for High Luminance Red Light-Emitting Diodes

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 48, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202005990

关键词

halide perovskite nanowires; light-emitting diodes; scalable synthesis; ultralow trap density

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51961135107, 51774034, 11704015]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0119700, 2016YFB0700700]
  3. National Natural Science Fund for Innovative Research Groups [51621003]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2182039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bright red emission (620-650 nm) from perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) is usually achieved via a composition including both bromine and iodine anions, which results in poor performance and stability due to phase separation under operating conditions. Here a large-scale ligand-assisted reprecipitation method is devised with nonpolar solvent that enables the fabrication of CsPbI(3)nanowire clusters, emitting at 600 nm. The blue-shift of this emission relative to that of bulk CsPbI3(approximate to 700 nm) is attributed to quantum confinement in nanowires. The growth of the nanowires is along the [011] crystal direction and is vacancy driven, resulting in the healing of surface defects and thereby a high photoluminescence quantum yield of 91%. The clusters with ultralow trap density show remarkable structural and environmental stability. PeLEDs based on these clusters exhibit an external quantum efficiency of 6.2% with Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage coordinates of (0.66, 0.34), and record luminance of 13 644 cd m(-2)of red electroluminescence. The half-lifetime under an accelerated stability test is 13.5 min for an unencapsulated device in ambient conditions operating at an initial luminance of 11 500 cd m(-2), which corresponds to an estimated half-lifetime of 694 h at 100 cd m(-2)based on acceleration factor obtained by experimental testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据