4.6 Article

Wettability, Diffusion Behaviors, and Modeling of Ni Nanoparticles and Nanowires in Brazing Inconel 718

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202001053

关键词

brazing; inconel; nanomaterials; nickel; wetting

资金

  1. Rolls-Royce Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni nanoparticles (NPs) and nanowires (NWs) are compared as brazing filler metals for joining Inconel 718. NWs significantly enhance the strength of brazed joints compared to NP joints. The experiment displays that the contact angle in brazing with NPs is higher than that with NWs, and a modified Hart's equation is proposed for predicting the effective interdiffusion coefficients of nanomaterials. The enhanced brazing strength with NW fillers is explained by the size-dependent transient liquid phase diffusion that mainly controls the diffusion coefficients determined by Sauer-Friese analysis for NWs.
Ni nanoparticles (NPs) and nanowires (NWs) are compared as brazing filler metals for joining Inconel 718. NWs significantly enhance the strength of brazed joints compared to NP joints (270 MPa). Herein, joints formed with a pure NW pellet and a NW-NP mixed pellet yield average lap shear bonding strengths of 319.2 and 370 MPa, respectively. The experiment displays that the contact angle in brazing with NPs is higher than that with NWs. A modified Hart's equation is also proposed for predicting the effective interdiffusion coefficients of nanomaterials that account for surface diffusion in addition to lattice and grain boundary diffusion. The diffusion coefficients calculated by the modified Hart's equation are consistent with the values determined by Sauer-Friese analysis for NPs, but for NWs, the diffusion coefficients determined by Sauer-Friese are mainly controlled by grain boundary diffusion, significantly higher than those predicted by the modified Hart's equation due to size-dependent transient liquid phase diffusion. This explains the enhanced brazing strength with NW fillers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据