4.1 Article

Intermittent self-administration of fentanyl induces a multifaceted addiction state associated with persistent changes in the orexin system

期刊

ADDICTION BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12946

关键词

behavioral economics; demand; hypocretin; long access; opioids; reinstatement

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [K99DA045765, R01 DA006214]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia C.J. Martin Fellowship [1072706]
  3. National Institutes of Health [K12 GM093854]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The orexin system is critical in motivated drug taking, with IntA self-administration of fentanyl resulting in addiction-like behaviors reversed by orexin-1 receptor antagonist. The IntA model proves useful in studying opioid addiction.
The orexin (hypocretin) system plays a critical role in motivated drug taking. Cocaine self-administration with the intermittent access (IntA) procedure produces a robust addiction-like state that is orexin-dependent. Here, we sought to determine the role of the orexin system in opioid addiction using IntA self-administration of fentanyl. Different groups of male rats were either given continuous access in 1-h period (short access [ShA]), 6-h period (long access [LgA]), or IntA (5 min of access separated by 25 min of no access for 6 h) to fentanyl for 14 days. IntA produced a greater escalation of fentanyl intake, increased motivation for fentanyl on a behavioral economics task, persistent drug seeking during abstinence, and stronger cue-induced reinstatement compared with rats given ShA or LgA. We found that addiction behaviors induced by IntA to fentanyl were reversed by the orexin-1 receptor antagonist SB-334867. IntA to fentanyl was also associated with a persistent increase in the number of orexin neurons. Together, these results indicate that the IntA model is a useful tool in the study of opioid addiction and that the orexin system is critical for the maintenance of addiction behaviors induced by IntA self-administration of fentanyl.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据