4.6 Article

Further Studies on Triazinoindoles as Potential Novel Multitarget-Directed Anti-Alzheimer's Agents

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 3557-3574

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00448

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; MTDL; acetylcholinesterase; butyrylcholinesterase; A beta aggregation; triazinoindole; DPPH

资金

  1. DST-INSPIRE, New Delhi [IF-150660]
  2. UGC, New Delhi [25-1/2014-15(BSR)/7-129/2007/(BSR)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inadequate clinical efficacy of the present anti-Alzheimer's disease (AD) drugs and their low impact on the progression of Alzheimer's disease in patients have revised the research focus from single targets to multitarget-directed ligands. A novel series of substituted triazinoindole derivatives were obtained by introducing various substituents on the indole ring for the development of multitarget-directed ligands as anti-AD agents. The experimental data indicated that some of these compounds exhibited significant anti-AD properties. Among them, 8-(piperidin-1-yl)-N-(6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)hexyl)-5H-[1,2,4]triazino[5,6-b]indol-3-amine (60), the most potent cholinesterase inhibitor (AChE, IC50 value of 0.32 mu M; BuChE, IC50 value of 0.21 mu M), was also found to possess significant self-mediated A beta(1-)(42) aggregation inhibitory activity (54% at 25 mu M concentration). Additionally, compound 60 showed strong antioxidant activity. In the PAMPA assay, compound 60 exhibited blood-brain barrier penetrating ability. An acute toxicity study in rats demonstrated no sign of toxicity at doses up to 2000 mg/kg. Furthermore, compound 60 significantly restored the cognitive deficits in the scopolamine-induced mice model and A beta(1-)(42)-induced rat model. In the in silico ADMET prediction studies, the compound satisfied all the parameters of CNS acting drugs. These results highlighted the potential of compound 60 to be a promising multitarget-directed ligand for the development of potential anti-AD drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据