4.8 Article

Enhancing the Thermoelectric Performance of Calcium Cobaltite Ceramics by Tuning Composition and Processing

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 42, 页码 47634-47646

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c14916

关键词

oxide thermoelectric; cobaltite; cobalt deficiency; bismuth substitution; annealing temperature

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/H043462, EP/I036230/1, EP/L014068/1, EP/L017695/1]
  2. Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials - EPSRC [EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P025021/1, EP/P025498/1]
  3. Xray facilities in the Department of Materials in the University of Manchester
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. EPSRC [EP/L017695/1, EP/P025021/1, EP/S019367/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium cobaltite (Ca3Co4O9) is a promising p-type thermoelectric oxide material. Here, we present an approach to optimize the thermoelectric performance of Ca3Co4O9 by controlling the chemical composition and fabrication process. Ca3-xBixCo3.92O9+delta (0.1 = x = 0.3) and Ca2.7Bi0.3CoyO9+delta (3.92 = y = 4.0) ceramics were prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). Stoichiometric mixtures of raw materials were combined and calcined at 1203 K for 12 h, followed by SPS at 1023 K for 5 min at 50 MPa. The samples were subsequently annealed at 1023 or 1203 K for 12 h in air. XRD and HRTEM analyses confirmed the formation of the cobaltite misfit phase with minor amounts of secondary phases; SEM-EDS showed the presence of Bi-rich and Co-rich secondary phases. After annealing at 1203 K, the secondary phases were significantly reduced. By controlling the cobalt deficiency and level of bismuth substitution, the electrical conductivity was enhanced without degrading Seebeck coefficients, promoting a high power factor of 0.34 mW m(-1) K-2 at 823 K (parallel to the ab planes, //ab). Due to enhanced phonon scattering, the thermal conductivity was reduced by 20%. As a result, a highly competitive ZT(//ab) of 0.16 was achieved for Ca2.7Bi0.3Co3.92O9+delta ceramics at 823 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据