4.8 Article

Co-Casting Highly Selective Dual-Layer Membranes with Disordered Block Polymer Selective Layers

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 40, 页码 45351-45362

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c13726

关键词

ultrafiltration; block polymer; composite membrane; permeability-selectivity; order-disorder; transition; co-casting

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1609459, DMR-2003454]
  2. NSF through the MRSEC program
  3. Northwestern University
  4. E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co.
  5. Dow Chemical Company
  6. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. NSF [0960140, MRI DMR1229263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly selective and water permeable dual-layer ultrafiltration (UF) membranes comprising a disordered poly(methyl methacrylate-stat-styrene)-block-poly(lactide) selective layer and a polysulfone (PSF) support layer were fabricated using a co-casting technique. A dilute solution of diblock polymer was spin coated onto a solvent-swollen PSF layer, rapidly heated to dry and disorder the block polymer layer, and subsequently immersed into an ice water coagulation bath to kinetically trap the disordered state in the block polymer selective layer and precipitate the support layer by nonsolvent-induced phase separation. Subsequent removal of the polylactide block generated porous membranes suitable for UF. The permeability of these dual-layer membranes was modulated by tuning the concentration of the PSF casting solution, while the size-selectivity was maintained because of the narrow pore size distribution of the self-assembled block polymer selective layer. Elimination of the thermal annealing step resulted in a dramatic increase in the water permeability without adversely impacting the size-selectivity, as the disordered nanostructure present in the concentrated casting solution was kinetically trapped upon rapid drying. The co-casting strategy outlined in this work may enable the scalable fabrication of block polymer membranes with both high permeability and high selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据