4.8 Article

Hierarchically Manipulated Charge Recombination for Mitigating Energy Loss in CsPbI2Br Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 37, 页码 41596-41604

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c13116

关键词

all-inorganic perovskite solar cells; defect passivation; energy loss; stability; halogen vacancy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61520106012, 61722404, 51873138, 61905171, 11874380, 11675252, U1632265]
  2. 333 Program [BRA2019061]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20190815]
  4. Jiangsu Provincial Research Scheme of Natural Science for Higher Education Institutions [19KJB510056]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-inorganic perovskite cesium lead iodide/bromide (CsPbI2Br) is considered as a robust absorber for perovskite solar cells (PSCs) because of its excellent thermal stability that guarantees its long-term operation stability. Efficient CsPbI2Br PSCs are available when obtaining low energy loss, which needs efficient charge generation, less charge recombination, and balanced charge extraction. However, numerous traps in perovskites hinder the photon-electron conversion process. Herein, hierarchical manipulation of charge recombination is proposed for CsPbI2Br PSCs featuring low energy loss. Nonselective trap reduction and selective halogen vacancy passivation are performed using 2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethylamine and phenylbutylammonium iodide for the bottom and top contacts, respectively. Because of all-around suppressed charge recombination, balanced charge extraction and suppressed hysteresis are realized. The champion PSC achieves an open-circuit voltage of 1.30 eV, a fill factor of 80.2%, and a power conversion efficiency of 16.6% that is 28.6% higher than that of the reference device. Moreover, the thermostability of PSCs is simultaneously enhanced because of the limited defect-assisted degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据