4.8 Article

Polydopamine-Mesoporous Silica Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Combined Photothermal Immunotherapy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 38, 页码 42499-42510

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c10781

关键词

cancer immunotherapy; mesoporous silica; NIR-responsive drug delivery; polydopamine nanoparticles; photothermal therapy

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21 CA236652, R01 CA141521]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer immunotherapy involves a cascade of events that ultimately leads to cytotoxic immune cells effectively identifying and destroying cancer cells. Responsive nanomaterials, which enable spatiotemporal orchestration of various immunological events for mounting a highly potent and long-lasting antitumor immune response, are an attractive platform to overcome challenges associated with existing cancer immunotherapies. Here, we report a multifunctional near-infrared (NIR)responsive core-shell nanoparticle, which enables (i) photothermal ablation of cancer cells for generating tumor-associated antigen (TAA) and (ii) triggered release of an immunomodulatory drug (gardiquimod) for starting a series of immunological events. The core of these nanostructures is composed of a polydopamine nanoparticle, which serves as a photothermal agent, and the shell is made of mesoporous silica, which serves as a drug carrier. We employed a phase-change material as a gatekeeper to achieve concurrent release of both TAA and adjuvant, thus efficiently activating the antigen-presenting cells. Photothermal immunotherapy enabled by these nanostructures resulted in regression of primary tumor and significantly improved inhibition of secondary tumor in a mouse melanoma model. These biocompatible, biodegradable, and NIR-responsive core-shell nanostructures simultaneously deliver payload and cause photothermal ablation of the cancer cells. Our results demonstrate potential of responsive nanomaterials in generating highly synergistic photothermal immunotherapeutic response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据