4.6 Article

Successful Extrapolation of Paracetamol Exposure from Adults to Infants After Oral Administration of a Pediatric Aqueous Suspension Is Highly Dependent on the Study Dosing Conditions

期刊

AAPS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-00504-6

关键词

infants; food effect; oral absorption; paracetamol; physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks programme [674909]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extending licensed drug use to the pediatric population has become an essential part of the drug development process. Nonetheless, ethical concerns limit clinical testing in pediatric populations and data collected from oral bioavailability and food effect studies in adults are often extrapolated to the target pediatric (sub)populations. However, based on published information, food effects on drug absorption in infants may not be adequately evaluated by data collected in adults. In the present study, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach for modeling paracetamol suspension data collected in adults was proposed with the ultimate aim to investigate whether extrapolation to infants is substantially affected by the dosing conditions applied to adults. The development of the PBPK model for adults was performed using GastroPlus (TM) V9.7, and after scaling to infants considering physiological, anatomical, and drug clearance changes, extrapolation of the different dosing conditions was performed by applying dosing conditions dependent on changes on the paracetamol gastric emptying process. Successful simulations of previously observed plasma concentration levels in infants were achieved when extrapolating from fasted and infant formula-fed conditions data. Data collected following the reference meal appeared less useful for simulating paracetamol suspension performance in infants. The proposed methodology deserves further evaluation using high-quality clinical data both in adults and in infants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据