4.6 Article

Registered nurses' experiences of communication with patients when practising person-centred care over the phone: a qualitative interview study

期刊

BMC NURSING
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12912-020-00448-4

关键词

Person-centred care; Professional role; Telephone; Qualitative

类别

资金

  1. Swedish government [2009-1088]
  2. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. Swedish Research Council [DNr 521-2013-2723]
  4. Research and Development Unit, Primary Health Care, Region Vastra Gotaland
  5. Umea University
  6. Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC) at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  7. [ALFGBG-444681]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background To explore registered nurses' (RNs') experiences of practising person-centred care (PCC) by telephone with people diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic heart failure. Methods Qualitative interview study. Four RNs were individually interviewed before, during, and after participating in an intervention practising PCC by telephone. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The results reflect three categories of their experience: realize the complexity of practising PCC by distance, gain insight into what PCC communication meant to RNs and their approach, and develop the professional role by practising PCC theory and ethics. Conclusions PCC over the telephone facilitate healthcare and support patients. Through careful listening, the RNs (1) created space for the individual patients to express their thoughts and feelings and (2) emphasized each patient's capabilities and resources. The RNs also gained an understanding of PCC and what it means to patients and to themselves as practitioners. Potential implications are that it is important for RNs practising PCC by telephone to remould their role, to listen carefully, and to communicate as equals in conversations that respect both parties' knowledge and expertise. Health professionals need supervision and support to fully understand the person-centred approach and provide communications that support it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据