4.4 Article

Pigments Content (Chlorophylls, Fucoxanthin and Phycobiliproteins) of Different Commercial Dried Algae

期刊

SEPARATIONS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/separations7020033

关键词

algae; Himanthalia elongata; Undaria pinnatifida; Laminaria ochroleuca; Porphyraspp; Spirulinaspp; pigments extraction

资金

  1. FCT/MCTES [UIDB/50006/2020]
  2. FCT [UIDB/50006/2020, SFRH/BD/109042/2015, SFRH/BD/122754/2016, CEECIND/01120/2017]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/122754/2016, SFRH/BD/109042/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Algae are a complex, polyphyletic group of organisms, affordable and naturally rich in nutrients, but also valuable sources of structurally diverse bioactive substances such as natural pigments. The aim of this work was to evaluate the polar and non-polar pigment contents of different commercial dried algae (brown:Himanthalia elongata,Undaria pinnatifida,Laminaria ochroleuca; red:Porphyraspp.; and a blue-green microalga:Spirulinaspp.). The pigment extraction was carried out using different solvents (100% methanol, 100% methanol acid free, 100% ethanol, 90% acetone,N,N-dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide-water (4:1,v/v) and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer), selected according to their affinity for each class of pigments. Acetone proved to be an efficient solvent to extract chlorophylls from brown and red algae, but not fromSpirulinaspp.Porphyraspp. presented considerably higher levels of all pigments compared to brown algae, although Spirulinaspp. presented significantly higher (p<0.05) levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids and phycobiliproteins, compared to all macroalgae. The content of fucoxanthin extracted from the three brown algae was highly correlated to the carotenoid content. Within this group,Himanthalia elongatapresented the highest fucoxanthin/total carotenoids ratio. Although the yield of extraction depended on the solvent used, the algae studied herein are an interesting source of pigments of great value for a wide range of applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据