4.7 Article

Time-sensitivity mechanism of rock stress memory properties under tensile stress

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.012

关键词

Acoustic emission (AE); Time-sensitivity; Stress memory; Kaiser effect (KE); Brazilian disc rotation; Power spectrum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779021]
  2. Chongqing Natural Science Foundation [cstc2019jcyj-msxm2176]
  3. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJQN201800745]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In deep underground engineering, understanding of time-related stress memory properties is critical to evaluate the in situ stress conditions of a rock mass. In this study, the time-sensitivity mechanism of the rock stress memory properties under tensile stress was investigated. It was found that the material property (Poisson's ratio) and crack angle were the controlling factors of the Kaiser effect (KE) under tensile stress. In particular, the time-sensitivity of the stress memory properties was closely related to the crack growth path. When the failure of the rock specimen was dominated by tensile microcracks and the crack development direction was deflected by up to 30 degrees in the successive loading process, the stress memory capacity was likely to be time-independent for a sandstone specimen. The distribution of the Felicity ratio in a Brazilian test was more discrete than that in a three-point bending test. It also showed that the changes in the crack path, rather than the time interval between successive loading cycles, led to inaccuracy of the detected KE. This study provides insights into stress memory-related issues under uniaxial or more complex stress conditions and thus facilitates development of methods for testing in situ mechanical behaviors of rocks with acoustic emission (AE) technology. (C) 2020 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据