4.5 Article

Comparison and Combination of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration and Adsorption Processes: A Mathematical Approach for Mitigation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Losses during Genotoxin Removal

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes10040073

关键词

hybrid process; adsorption; API purification; OSN

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/QEQ-PRS/4157/2014]
  2. iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences [UID/BIO/04565/2020]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq-Brasil) [205201/2014-8]
  4. Programa Operacional Regional de Lisboa 2020 [Lisboa-01-0145-FEDER-007317]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/QEQ-PRS/4157/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are synthesized using highly reactive reagents, catalysts, and solvents. Some of those persist as impurities in the final product and are genotoxic or carcinogenic. The conventional processes used for API purification and isolation are able to achieve the limits imposed by regulatory agencies, but at the expense of significant API losses. Here we report the development of a model to aid in the decision of which dedicated purification process, membrane or adsorption, is most suitable for removal of genotoxic impurities (GTIs), according with a small set of key intrinsic parameters. A hybrid process was developed, combining these two unit operations, to be applied when the use of OSN or adsorption alone result on non-acceptable API losses. Membrane solute rejection and solvent flux was used as parameter for OSN. In the case of adsorption, two isotherm models, Langmuir and Freundlich, were considered. The effect of the recirculation stream and amount of adsorber used on the hybrid process was investigated. Case studies were experimentally validated, confirming that combining the two unit operations can reduce API loss from 24.76% in OSN to 9.76% in a hybrid process. Economic and environmental analyses were performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据