4.3 Article

Somatic SLC35A2 mosaicism correlates with clinical findings in epilepsy brain tissue

期刊

NEUROLOGY-GENETICS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000460

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nationwide Foundation Pediatric Innovation Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Many genetic studies of intractable epilepsy in pediatric patients primarily focus on inherited, constitutional genetic deficiencies identified in patient blood. Recently, studies have revealed somatic mosaicism associated with epilepsy in which genetic variants are present only in a subset of brain cells. We hypothesize that tissue-specific, somatic mosaicism represents an important genetic etiology in epilepsy and aim to discover somatic alterations in epilepsy-affected brain tissue. Methods We have pursued a research study to identify brain somatic mosaicism, using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, in patients with treatment refractory epilepsy who have undergone surgical resection of affected brain tissue. Results We used an integrated combination of NGS techniques and conventional approaches (radiology, histopathology, and electrophysiology) to comprehensively characterize multiple brain regions from a single patient with intractable epilepsy. We present a 3-year-old male patient with West syndrome and intractable tonic seizures in whom we identified a pathogenic frameshift somatic variant in SLC35A2, present at a range of variant allele fractions (4.2%-19.5%) in 12 different brain tissues detected by targeted sequencing. The proportion of the SLC35A2 variant correlated with severity and location of neurophysiology and neuroimaging abnormalities for each tissue. Conclusions Our findings support the importance of tissue-based sequencing and highlight a correlation in our patient between SLC35A2 variant allele fractions and the severity of epileptogenic phenotypes in different brain tissues obtained from a grid-based resection of clinically defined epileptogenic regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据