4.6 Article

Learning Scheduling Policies for Multi-Robot Coordination With Graph Attention Networks

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 4509-4516

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3002198

关键词

Task analysis; Optimal scheduling; Job shop scheduling; Robot kinematics; Processor scheduling; Schedules; Planning; scheduling and coordination; imitation learning; multi-robot systems

类别

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [GR10006659]
  2. Lockheed Martin Corporation [GR00000509]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing interest in integrating advanced robotics within manufacturing has spurred a renewed concentration in developing real-time scheduling solutions to coordinate human-robot collaboration in this environment. Traditionally, the problem of scheduling agents to complete tasks with temporal and spatial constraints has been approached either with exact algorithms, which are computationally intractable for large-scale, dynamic coordination, or approximate methods that require domain experts to craft heuristics for each application. We seek to overcome the limitations of these conventional methods by developing a novel graph attention network-based scheduler to automatically learn features of scheduling problems towards generating high-quality solutions. To learn effective policies for combinatorial optimization problems, we combine imitation learning, which makes use of expert demonstration on small problems, with graph neural networks, in a non-parametric framework, to allow for fast, near-optimal scheduling of robot teams with various sizes, while generalizing to large, unseen problems. Experimental results showed that our network-based policy was able to find high-quality solutions for similar to 90% of the testing problems involving scheduling 2-5 robots and up to 100 tasks, which significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art, approximate methods. Those results were achieved with affordable computation cost and up to 100x less computation time compared to exact solvers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据