4.7 Article

Genetic switches designed for eukaryotic cells and controlled by serine integrases

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0971-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. INCT BioSyn (National Institute of Science and Technology in Synthetic Biology)
  2. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)
  3. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  4. Brazilian Ministry of Health
  5. FAPDF (Research Support Foundation of the Federal District), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, new serine integrases have been identified, increasing the possibility of scaling up genomic modulation tools. Here, we describe the use of unidirectional genetic switches to evaluate the functionality of six serine integrases in different eukaryotic systems: the HEK 293T cell lineage, bovine fibroblasts and plant protoplasts. Moreover, integrase activity was also tested in human cell types of therapeutic interest: peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), neural stem cells (NSCs) and undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells. The switches were composed of plasmids designed to flip two different genetic parts driven by serine integrases. Cell-based assays were evaluated by measurement of EGFP fluorescence and by molecular analysis of attL/attR sites formation after integrase functionality. Our results demonstrate that all the integrases were capable of inverting the targeted DNA sequences, exhibiting distinct performances based on the cell type or the switchable genetic sequence. These results should support the development of tunable genetic circuits to regulate eukaryotic gene expression. Gomide et al. generate unidirectional genetic switches to test the site-specific recombination function of six recently identified serine integrases in a range of eukaryotic cells. They report that one of the integrases Int13 is as active in vertebrate cells as the currently top performing integrases, Bxb1 and PhiC31.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据