4.7 Article

Inorganic Encapsulation Method Using Solution-Processible Polysilazane for Flexible Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 9257-9263

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01593

关键词

inorganic encapsulation; solution processible; stability; perovskite; solar cells

资金

  1. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2017M1A2A2048905]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE)
  3. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the International Cooperative RD program [P0006857]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [P0006857] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M1A2A2048905] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we employed the method of perhydropolysilazane (PHPS) conversion into silica for encapsulating flexible perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The conversion process was conducted by the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation method. To avoid the degradation of PSCs by the PHPS solution and high-energy light illumination of VUV (lambda = 172 nm), the CdSe/ZnS-quantum dot (QD) was diffused in the polydimethylsiloxane matrix as a barrier layer. The barrier layer efficiently blocked the penetration of the PHPS solution into PSCs and UV illumination during the PHPS curing process. The resulting encapsulation layer presented a water vapor transmission rate of 8.63 x 10(-3) g m(-2) d(-1) (37.8 degrees C/100 RH %, relative humidity), enhancing the performance of PSCs because of the luminescence downshifting from QDs. Finally, we applied this encapsulation method to flexible PSCs. Their lifetime was enhanced by more than 400 h under ambient temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据