4.7 Article

In Situ Structural and Electrical Conductivity Characterization of Sr2MMoO6-δ Double Perovskite Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Anode Materials

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 5353-5360

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c00376

关键词

solid oxide fuel cells; X-ray scattering; in situ technique; conductivity; double perovskite

资金

  1. U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology
  2. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of Sr2MMoO6-delta double perovskite solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) anode materials (where 0 <= delta <= 0.041 and M = Fe, Co, or Ni) were synthesized, and the changes in their morphologies under relevant SOFC operating conditions were explored. Ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) were used to determine changes in the microstructures and phase compositions of the anode materials at high temperatures and under a reducing atmosphere. The stability of the double perovskite structure was found to be highly dependent on the identity of the cation M, such that when M = Fe, the material remained stable over the course of the experiments. However, when M = Co or Ni, significant changes in the microstructure and phase composition were observed. An in situ study of the M = Co sample, in which electrical conductivity and USAXS/SAXS/WAXS measurements were conducted simultaneously, revealed the structural degradation mechanisms and electrical conductivity changes over a range of temperatures. To conduct these measurements, a cell was developed that allowed for a sample mounted on Pt wires to be placed in the X-ray beam and heated under gas flow comprising 4% mass H-2 and 96% mass N-2. The resulting measurements allowed for the direct comparison of the electrical and morphological changes occurring in the material under operating conditions, such that increases in conductivity could be attributed to the growth of new phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据