4.6 Article

Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer

期刊

NPJ BREAST CANCER
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0156-0

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) [17-194]
  2. National Breast Cancer Foundation of Australia Endowed Chair [NBCF-17-001]
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation, New York [BCRF-19-102]
  4. Susan G Komen Foundation [CCR18547966]
  5. Breast Cancer Alliance
  6. Canadian Cancer Society
  7. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [1U24CA199374-01, R01CA202752-01A1, R01CA208236-01A1, R01 CA216579-01A1, R01 CA220581-01A1, 1U01 CA239055-01]
  8. National Center for Research Resources [1 C06 RR12463-01]
  9. VA Merit Review Award from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [IBX004121A]
  10. DOD Prostate Cancer Idea Development Award [W81XWH-15-1-0558]
  11. DOD Lung Cancer Investigator-Initiated Translational Research Award [W81XWH-18-1-0440]
  12. DOD Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-16-1-0329]
  13. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund
  14. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering
  15. Clinical and Translational Science Award Program (CTSA) at Case Western Reserve University
  16. NCI [U10CA180868, 180822, UG1-189867, U24196067, UG3CA225021, U24CA215109]
  17. Cancer Research UK [FC001169, FC001202]
  18. UK Medical Research Council [FC001169, FC001202]
  19. Wellcome Trust [FC001169, FC001202]
  20. Cancer Research UK (TRACERx)
  21. Cancer Research UK (CRUK Cancer Immunotherapy Catalyst Network)
  22. CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence
  23. Stand Up 2 Cancer (SU2C)
  24. Rosetrees Trust
  25. Butterfield Trust
  26. Stoneygate Trust
  27. NovoNordisk Foundation [ID16584]
  28. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  29. Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF)
  30. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) Consolidator Grant [FP7THESEUS-617844]
  31. European's Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [665233]
  32. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [835297]
  33. National Institute for Health Research
  34. University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  35. Cancer Research UK University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  36. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  37. Genentech
  38. European Commission ITN [FP7-PloidyNet 607722]
  39. ERC Advanced Grant (PROTEUS)
  40. Francis Crick Institute
  41. Cancer Research UK [25351] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据