4.6 Article

Colossal magnetoresistance in a nonsymmorphic antiferromagnetic insulator

期刊

NPJ QUANTUM MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41535-020-00256-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) BES Quantum Fluctuations in Narrow-Band Systems project
  2. DOE BES Science of 100 Tesla project
  3. LANL Director's Postdoctoral LDRD program
  4. National Science Foundation [NSF/DMR-1644779]
  5. State of Florida
  6. FAPESP (SP-Brazil) [2018/11364-7, 2017/10581-1, 2012/04870-7]
  7. CNPq [141026/2017-0]
  8. CAPES
  9. FINEP-Brazil
  10. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N027671/1, EP/N034694/1]
  11. DOE [de-sc0016239]
  12. NSF EAGER [1004957]
  13. Simons Investigator Grants
  14. ARO MURI [W911NF- 12-1-0461]
  15. Packard Foundation
  16. Schmidt Fund for Innovative Research
  17. Max Planck society
  18. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11974395]
  19. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDB33000000]
  20. CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program
  21. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/04870-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we investigate antiferromagnetic Eu5In2Sb6, a nonsymmorphic Zintl phase. Our electrical transport data show that Eu5In2Sb6 is remarkably insulating and exhibits an exceptionally large negative magnetoresistance, which is consistent with the presence of magnetic polarons. From ab initio calculations, the paramagnetic state of Eu5In2Sb6 is a topologically nontrivial semimetal within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA), whereas an insulating state with trivial topological indices is obtained using a modified Becke-Johnson potential. Notably, GGA+U calculations suggest that the antiferromagnetic phase of Eu5In2Sb6 may host an axion insulating state. Our results provide important feedback for theories of topological classification and highlight the potential of realizing clean magnetic narrow-gap semiconductors in Zintl materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据