4.7 Article

Surface Sulfuration of NiO Boosts the Performance of Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000270

关键词

interface engineering; perovskite solar cells; surface doping

资金

  1. HKRGC General Research Funds (GRF) [16312216]
  2. HK Innovation and Technology Fund [GHP/079/17SZ]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [21972006, 21905006, 51961165105, 51773230, 21805010]
  4. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053015544057]
  5. Nanshan Pilot Plan [LHTD20170001]
  6. HKRGC Areas of Excellence Scheme [AoE/P-02/12]
  7. Shenzhen & Hong Kong Joint Research Program [SGLH20180622092406130]
  8. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2017B030314002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As one of the most promising hole-transporting materials for perovskite solar cells (PSC), NiO is widely used in the inverted p-i-n cell structure due to its high stability, decent hole conductivity, and easy processability for hysteresis-free cells. However, the efficiency of NiO-based PSCs is still low, due largely to the poor perovskite/NiO interface. Herein, a sulfur-doping strategy to modify NiO surface via ion exchange reaction by a simple and scalable chemical bath deposition technique is introduced, which greatly improves the photovoltaic (PV) performance of the derived devices. A systematic investigation is shown where sulfur doping leads to favorable interfacial energetics with a reduced V-oc loss. Sulfur doping at the interface also improves the contact between NiO and perovksite and facilitates the formation of high-quality perovskite films. Carrier dynamics studies demonstrate reduced defect states and trap-assisted recombination with sulfur doping, which promote the PV performance of the devices. These merits contribute concurrently to low-loss charge transfer across the perovskite/NiO interface and facilitate charge transport through the perovskite films, leading to a high champion efficiency of 20.43% of the p-i-n structure solar cell devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据