4.8 Article

Mir-27a-3p attenuates bronchiolitis obliterans in vivo via the regulation of dendritic cells' maturation and the suppression of myofibroblasts' differentiation

期刊

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.140

关键词

bronchiolitis obliterans; dendritic cells; lung transplantation; mir-27a-3p

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600073] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [18JCYBJC92600] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wu Jieping Medical Foundation [320.6750.18157] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Bethune Ethicon Excellent Surgery Foundation [HZB-20181119-7] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), is a chronic rejection phenotype characterized by chronic small airway fibrous obliteration, hinders the patients who suffer from lung transplanting for surviving longer. Cell-based therapies using dendritic cells (DCs) and T regulatory cells (Tregs) have been developed to regulate allograft rejection, and to induce and maintain immune tolerance. In the present study, the effects of mir-27a-3p on regulating DCs as well as resulting effects on BO attenuation have been investigated. According to our reporter assays, the potential targets of mir-27a-3p were Smad2, sprouty2, and Smad4, respectively. Furthermore, sprouty2 inhibition by mir-27-3p indirectly activated extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) and increased IL-10 production in DCs. This led to a positive feedback loop that maintained the immature state of DCs via IL-10/JAK/STAT3 pathway, and caused an increase in Foxp3(+)CD4(+)T cells amount as well as TGF-beta level. Furthermore, mir-27a-3p regulated TGF-beta function, inhibited TGF-beta/Smad pathway, and suppressed myofibroblast differentiation through influencing the function of Smad2 and Smad4. In short, the study indicated the effect of mir-27a-3p on suppressing DC maturation, which implicated the potential clinical application in treating postlung transplant BO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据