4.7 Article

Multi-objective design optimization of composite submerged cylindrical pressure hull for minimum buoyancy factor and maximum buckling load capacity

期刊

DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 1190-1206

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.06.017

关键词

Multi-objective genetic algorithm; Optimization; Composite submersible pressure hull; Thin shell; Material failure; Shell buckling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679056]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [E2016024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the design optimization of a composite submersible cylindrical pressure hull under 3 MPa hydrostatic pressure. The study considers different composite materials and layups, using a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and Analytical Analysis to achieve optimization objectives such as minimizing buoyancy factor and maximizing buckling load factor.
This paper presents the design optimization of composite submersible cylindrical pressure hull subjected to 3 MPa hydrostatic pressure. The design optimization study is conducted for cross-ply layups [0(s)/90(t)/0(u)], [0(s)/90(t)/0(u)]s, [0(s)/90(t)]s and [90(s)/0(t)]s considering three uni-directional composites, i.e. Carbon/Epoxy, Glass/ Epoxy, and Boron/Epoxy. The optimization study is performed by coupling a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) and Analytical Analysis. Minimizing the buoyancy factor and maximizing the buckling load factor are considered as the objectives of the optimization study. The objectives of the optimization are achieved under constraints on the Tsai-Wu, Tsai-Hill and Maximum Stress composite failure criteria and on buckling load factor. To verify the optimization approach, optimization of one particular layup configuration is also conducted in ANSYS with the same objectives and constraints. (C) 2020 China Ordnance Society. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据