4.6 Article

High-speed mechanical mapping of blended cement pastes and its comparison with standard modes of nanoindentation

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100806

关键词

Nanoindentation; Accelerated property mapping; Modulus mapping; Cement paste; Slag; Fly ash

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [17-05360S]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague [SGS18/114/OHK1/2T/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents a new nanoindentation mode of accelerated property mapping (XPM) which is designed to access local mechanical property maps in the order of minutes, i.e. much faster than with standard modes of grid nanoindentation or modulus mapping. XPM is tested on three typical cementitious samples: cement paste, fly-ash and slag blended cement pastes. The results from the techniques were found quantitatively comparable in terms of local mechanical properties. The methods are characterized by different spatial resolution, different property fluctuations and acquisition times. High-speed loading in XPM brings strain rate effects that are not present in standard modes. The paper summarizes advantages and disadvantages of each technique and shows mutual comparisons for the tested composites. It is concluded that the new XPM mode brings an advantage of very fast characterization of heterogeneous composites with reasonably high spatial resolution. The quantitativeness of the method is disturbed by strain rate effects causing artificial shift of the properties towards higher values compared to static loading cases. Some parameters associated with longer acquisition times such as creep properties are not captured with XPM. XPM is especially suited for fast sensing of local differences between composite phases on smaller areas (approximate to 10(3) mu m(2)). Statistical data from larger sample areas (104 105 mu m2) are still easier obtainable from classical grid nanoindentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据