4.6 Article

CuO Nanoparticle-Decorated TiO2-Nanotube Heterojunctions for Direct Synthesis of Methyl Formate via Photo-Oxidation of Methanol

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 5, 期 26, 页码 15942-15948

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01169

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21665020]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [223232]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [2018BS02004, 2017MS0203]
  4. Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [NJYT-20-B20]
  5. Program of Higher-level Talents of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University [NDYB2016-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methyl formate is widely employed as one of the important organic intermediates in Cl chemistry and as an environmentally benign chemical in the emerging area of green chemistry. We here study the catalytic effectiveness of CuO/TiO2-nanotube nanocomposites for the direct synthesis of methyl formate via methanol photo-oxidation in this paper. The CuO/TiO2-nanotube nanocomposites with 7% CuO weight loading give a promising photocatalytic performance (over 93.3% methanol conversion and 89.4% methyl formate selectivity) at 25 degrees C under 365 nm UV irradiation. The turnover frequency and the apparent quantum efficiency reach up to 22.9 mol(methanol) g(cat)(-1) h(-1) and 57.6% over 7% CuO/TiO2-nanotube, respectively, which is mainly because of the effective minimization of the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes by the surface ultrasmall-sized CuO particles. Furthermore, these CuO/TiO2-nanotube nanocomposites exhibit excellent durability and robust nature during the catalytic processes of the methanol photo-oxidation to methyl formate. The experimental results demonstrate the promise of the robust CuO/TiO2 nanocomposites for efficient and green production of methyl formate, which may offer guidelines for the design of efficient catalysts for selective alcohol conversion to other valuable chemicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据