4.6 Article

Factors Affecting Permeability Reduction of MICP for Fractured Rock

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.00217

关键词

MICP; grouting; fractured rock; fracture roughness; fracture aperture; permeability coefficient

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51674287, 51874354, 51508579]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has shown great potential to reduce the permeability of fractured rock, but its permeability reduction characteristic, affected by cementing solution concentration and geometric morphology of fractured rock, has not been presented. In this paper, a self-designed device for experimental MICP grouting and seepage performance was used to study the effects of factors including urea and calcium chloride concentration, fracture roughness and aperture on the permeability reduction of MICP on fractured rock. During the experiment, the same total volume of cement solution was injected into each sample with the same injection times. Based on the experimental results, the Darcy permeability coefficient of MICP grouted fractured rock was reduced to 3-5 x 10(-5)m/s by four orders of magnitude smaller than that of non-grouted fractured rock. An increase in fracture roughness, urea and calcium chloride concentrations, as well as a decrease of fracture aperture, caused the MICP grouting ratio in fractured rocks to decrease, as well as a decrease of the Darcy permeability coefficient. In addition, the permeability reduction of MICP on fractured rock increased with the decrement of the above four factors. The permeability coefficient of grouted fractured rock and the permeability reduction of MICP were excessively sensitive to urea concentration. Furthermore, the permeability reduction was fitted well by power function. The research results could provide important guidance and reference significance for MICP grouting application in rock engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据