4.6 Review

Management of patients with a failed kidney transplant: what should we do?

期刊

CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 98-106

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa094

关键词

allosensitization; allograft nephrectomy; dialysis; graft failure; immunosuppression; retransplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mortality rate for patients returning to dialysis after kidney transplant failure is significantly higher compared to those with functioning grafts. There is controversy surrounding the management of these patients, with a lack of clear clinical guidelines. Retransplantation is a feasible option that may help minimize morbidity and mortality risks associated with dialysis reinitiation.
The number of kidney transplant recipients returning to dialysis after graft failure is steadily increasing over time. Patients with a failed kidney transplant have been shown to have a significant increase in mortality compared with patients with a functioning graft or patients initiating dialysis for the first time. Moreover, the risk for infectious complications, cardiovascular disease and malignancy is greater than in the dialysis population due to the frequent maintenance of low-dose immunosuppression, which is required to reduce the risk of allosensitization, particularly in patients with the prospect of retransplantation from a living donor. The management of these patients present several controversial opinions and clinical guidelines are lacking. This article aims to review the leading evidence on the main issues in the management of patients with failed transplant, including the ideal timing and modality of dialysis reinitiation, the indications for an allograft nephrectomy or the correct management of immunosuppression during graft failure. In summary, retransplantation is a feasible option that should be considered in patients with graft failure and may help to minimize the morbidity and mortality risk associated with dialysis reinitiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据