4.7 Article

Hyperspectral Imaging Coupled with Multivariate Analysis and Image Processing for Detection and Visualisation of Colour in Cooked Sausages Stuffed in Different Modified Casings

期刊

FOODS
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods9081089

关键词

sausages; casings; core colour; discriminant analysis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [P16104]
  2. JSPS [16F16104, 20K15477]
  3. Exploratory Collaboration Seed in FY2020 Collaboration Seed Fund at Riken
  4. Special Postdoctoral Researcher Program at Riken
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P16104] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K15477, 16F16104] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hyperspectral imaging system was for the first time exploited to estimate the core colour of sausages stuffed in natural hog casings or in two hog casings treated with solutions containing surfactants and lactic acid in slush salt. Yellowness of sausages stuffed in natural hog casings (control group, 20.26 +/- 4.81) was significantly higher than that of sausages stuffed in casings modified by submersion for 90 min in a solution containing 1:30 (w/w) soy lecithin:distilled water, 2.5% wt. soy oil, and 21 mL lactic acid per kg NaCl (17.66 +/- 2.89) (p< 0.05). When predicting the lightness and redness of the sausage core, a partial least squares regression model developed from spectra pre-treated with a second derivative showed calibration coefficients of determination (R-c(2)) of 0.73 and 0.76, respectively. Ten, ten, and seven wavelengths were selected as the important optimal wavelengths for lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. Those wavelengths provide meaningful information for developing a simple, cost-effective multispectral system to rapidly differentiate sausages based on their core colour. According to the canonical discriminant analysis, lightness possessed the highest discriminant power with which to differentiate sausages stuffed in different casings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据