4.7 Article

Three Types of Beetroot Products Enriched with Lactic Acid Bacteria

期刊

FOODS
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods9060786

关键词

beetroot; lactic acid bacteria; betalains; functional food products

资金

  1. project Excellence, performance and competitiveness in the RDI activities at Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, acronym EXPERT - Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, Programme 1-Development of the national research and development system [14PFE/17.10.2018]
  2. project ANTREPRENORDOC from the European Social Fund [123847, 36355/23.05.2019 HRD OP/380/6/13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

y Beetroot (Beta vulgarisL.) represents a very rich source of bioactive compounds such as phenolic compounds and carotenoids, among which the most important being betalains, mainly betacyanins and betaxanthins. The beetroot matrix was used in a fresh or dried form or as lyophilized powder. A 10(12)CFU/g inoculum ofLactobacillus plantarumMIUG BL3 culture was sprayed on the vegetal tissue. The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) viability for all the products was evaluated over 21 days, by microbiological culture methods. The antioxidant activity of the obtained food products was correlated to the betalains content and the viability of LAB. The content of polyphenolic compounds varied between 225.7 and 1314.7 mg L-1, hence revealing a high content of bioactive compounds. Through the confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis, a large number of viable probiotic cells were observed in all the variants but especially in the fresh red beet cubes. After 21 days of refrigeration, the high content ofLb. plantarum(CFU per gram) of the food products was attributed to the biocompounds and the nutrients of the vegetal matrix that somehow protected the bacterial cells, and thus maintained their viability. The obtained food products enriched with probiotic LAB can be regarded as new functional food products due to the beneficial properties they possessed throughout the undertaken experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据