4.7 Article

Impact of double-stratification on convective flow of a non-Newtonian liquid in a Riga plate with Cattaneo-Christov double-flux and thermal radiation

期刊

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 969-981

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.010

关键词

Convection; Stratification; Thermal radiation; Second grade fluid; Cattaneo-Christov double flux; Riga plate

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [G-330-130-1440]
  2. DSR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the outcome of thermal radiation on a second grade fluid over a Riga plate with Cattaneo-Christov (CC) double flux and double stratification. The governing equations are transformed into ODEs and solved using homotopy analysis method. The study shows the impact of various parameters on fluid properties and provides conclusions on the effects of these parameters.
The intention of the paper is to find the outcome of thermal radiation of a second grade fluid over a Riga plate with Cattaneo-Christov (CC) double flux and double stratification's. The governing mathematical models are changed into an ordinary differential equations (ODE) using suitable transformations. These resultant models are analytically solved with homotopy analysis method. The impact of pertinent parameters on velocity distribution, temperature distribution, concentration distribution, skin friction coefficient, local Nusselt number and local Sherwood number is analyzed graphically. We found that the skin friction coefficient suppresses with enhancing the injection/suction parameter. The energy transfer gradient suppresses with rising the thermal stratification parameter. Also, we found that the mass transfer gradient decreases with increasing the solutal stratification parameter. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据